Submitted for Publication
Kang, X. J.,
T. J. Herron, et al. (2009). "Validation of the
Anisotropy Index Ellipsoidal Area Ratio (EAR) in Diffusion Tensor
Imaging."
A new diffusion anisotropy index,
Ellipsoidal Area Ratio (EAR), was described recently and proved to be less
noise-sensitive than fractional anisotropy (FA) by theory and simulation. Here
we show that EAR has higher signal to noise ratios than FA in average DTI data
from 40 normal subjects. EAR was also more sensitive than FA in detecting white
matter abnormalities in a patient with widespread diffuse axonal injury.
Yund, E. W. and D. L. Woods (2009). "Content and Procedural Learning in Repeated Sentence Tests of
Speech Perception."
Objectives.
Repeated testing of speech perception is critical in evaluating the
benefits of hearing aids and auditory rehabilitation, but learning the test can
masquerade as improved perception. A
large learning effect was reported in a previous study of the speech reception
threshold (SRT) in quiet, and, surprisingly, the performance improvement
occurred not only on sentences that were repeated but also on sentences that
the listeners had never heard before.
The objective of the first experiment was to determine the stability of
repeated measures with the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) when some sentences
were repeated and others were not. The
objective of the second experiment was to determine the stability of the HINT
and the QuickSIN when no sentences were repeated across test sessions.
Design. In
Exp.1, eight normal-hearing participants completed five HINT sessions on
separate days that included repeated sentence lists, while the first and last
sessions also included unique sentence lists.
The intensity of the noise was 65 dB (A). In Exp. 2, 23 normal-hearing participants
completed three sessions of the HINT and the QuickSIN with unique sentence
lists used on each day of testing. The
HINT noise and the QuickSIN sentences were presented at 70 dB (A).
Results. In
Exp. 1, SRTs for repeated sentence lists improved by an average of 2.7 dB,
while unique lists showed insignificant change across sessions. Content
learning was vulnerable to forgetting at a rate equivalent to -0.3 dB per
day. These results demonstrate content
learning but not procedural learning with the HINT and suggest that the HINT
provides stable measures of speech perception in noise when sentences are not
repeated. In Exp. 2, small but
significant improvements were seen for HINT SRTs (0.2 dB per session), while
QuickSIN SRTs showed an even smaller improvement (0.1 dB per session) that
failed to reach statistical significance.
Conclusions. Both
the HINT and the QuickSIN provide stable and sensitive measures of speech
perception over time. The results with
the HINT and QuickSIN at moderate noise levels differ from previous results
with another sentence test in quiet where SRTs improved 6-9 dB over five
sessions for both repeated and unique sentences. Differences in test procedures appear to
account for the difference in SRT stability.
In particular, testing in quiet may have facilitated thresholds gains
due to procedural learning for quiet listening, but similar gains were not
possible at moderate noise intensities.
Woods, D. L. and E. W. Yund (2009). "Consonant identification in nonsense syllables
and words."
The California Syllable Test (CST) was
designed to assess the ability of individual subjects to identify consonants in
consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) syllables presented in variable-intensity
speech-spectrum noise. Sixteen young
subjects with normal hearing identified 20 different initial and final consonants
in 720 CVCs, randomly sampled from a corpus 9,600 CVC tokens that included both
words and nonsense syllables. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were set to produce
mean d’ of 2.20 for each consonant, with noise levels adjusted during the
mid-vowel segment to provide appropriate SNRs for initial and final consonants
differing in intrinsic identifiability.
The 1-hr CST provided measures of consonant identification ability that
were precise to approximately 0.5 dB. Consonants were identified more accurately
in words than nonsense syllables, particularly at high SNRs. There were also
significant interactions in the processing of initial and final consonants.
Small learning effects were observed over the three days of testing. Moreover, performance on the CST accurately
predicted sentence reception thresholds measured with two tests, the HINT and
QuickSIN. The CST appears to be a promising tool for evaluating the effects of
audiological rehabilitation.
Turken, A.,
T. J. Herron, et al. (2009). "Multimodal surface-based morphometry reveals
diffuse cortical atrophy in traumatic brain injury: a case study."
While post-mortem investigations and animal
studies suggest that traumatic brain injury (TBI) produces widespread cortical
atrophy, TBI patients with significant cognitive deficits often present with
negative brain imaging finding. Here, we applied automated surfaced-based
morphometry (SBM) to quantify cortical abnormalities in a chronically impaired
TBI patient. By combining information from high-resolution structural MRI and
diffusion tensor imaging we found widespread but regionally specific
co-localized abnormalities in cortical thickness, neuropil density and
pericortical white matter integrity which were not evident on standard clinical
MRI scans. The findings were replicated across imaging sessions. SBM is a promising new tool for quantifying
cortical pathology in neurological disease.
Woods, D.
L., E. W. Yund, et al. (2009). "Quantifying consonant
identification in speech spectrum noise."
Sixteen young subjects with normal hearing
identified 20 different initial and final consonants of
consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) syllables randomly sampled from a corpus 9,600
tokens. Psychometric functions were obtained for each consonant at three
signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) spanning a range of 12 dB and centered at a
baseline SNR adjusted to produce a d’ of 2.20 for each consonant. Noise levels adjusted during the mid-vowel
segment to provide appropriate SNRs for initial and final consonants. The SNRs needed to equate the d’ measures for
different consonants varied by more than 40 dB and the slopes of d’
psychometric functions varied over a 4-fold range and. Large differences were also found in response
criteria for different consonants.
Confusion analysis showed frequent confusions in place of articulation,
followed by place + manner, manner, and voicing, with disproportionate
reductions in voicing and combined-feature errors as SNRs increased. With the
exception of liquids, most consonants were more easily perceived in the initial
than final syllable position. Different patterns of confusion were also found
for initial and final consonants, with a greater incidence of place confusions
found for final consonants.
Kang, X. J., T. J. Herron, et al. (2009). "Diffusion Properties Of Cortical Gray Matter And Pericortical White Matter: Regional Variations, Hemispheric Asymmetries, And Methodological Issues."
The characterization of average diffusion properties of cortical gray
and white matter in 3D space is complicated by the variability introduced by
intersubject differences in the relative locations of gyri and sulci. Here we introduce a new method is to visualize the average diffusion properties
of cortical gray matter and pericortical white matter on cortical surface maps. Mean diffusivity (MD) and
fractional anisotropy (FA) data were gathered from 60 subjects and co-registered
with high-resolution T1 images that had been inflated and co-registered to a
spherical coordinate system using FreeSurfer and then realigned to a
hemispherically unified coordinate system.
Five cortical surfaces in parallel with the white/gray junction were
defined. Diffusion properties were
analyzed on each of the surfaces and displayed using equal-area Mollweide
projections. The intra-subject reliability of FA and MD measures appears to be
sufficiently good relative to a healthy population’s intersubject variation to
provide reasonable power for group studies.
The differences between the left and right hemispheres for these
measures are also discussed as are lobar level differences. The
influence of CSF susceptibility and cortical thickness were investigates. We
find that FA is mostly unaffected by these confounds but MD needs to be
analyzed using these confounds as covariates or using previous suggested
techniques.